AuditCom.

AuditCom.Info

Home

About

Contact

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Legal Notices

BLOG

To search this Blog for certain terms, use the "Find" feature under "Edit" in your Web browser tool bar.

January 29, 2008

The PCAOB adopted Auditing Standard No. 6, Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements.

The PCAOB adopted the standard in light of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.

The new standard updates the auditor's responsibilities to evaluate and report on the consistency of a company's financial statements and align the auditor's responsibilities with SFAS No. 154. 

Auditing Standard No. 6 also improves the auditor reporting requirements by clarifying that the auditor's report should indicate whether an adjustment to previously issued financial statements results from a change in accounting principle or the correction of a misstatement. 

Auditing Standard No. 6 will become effective 60 days after SEC approval.

http://pcaob.org/News_and_Events/News/2008/01-29.aspx

January 29, 2008

The PCAOB adopted amendments to the PCAOB's interim auditing standards.

The PCAOB adopted the amendments in light of the impending issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

The PCAOB removed the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) from its interim auditing standards. The GAAP hierarchy identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in preparing financial statements.  The PCAOB believes that the GAAP hierarchy is more appropriately located in the accounting standards. Because the FASB intends to incorporate the hierarchy in the accounting standards, it no longer will be needed in the auditing standards. The PCAOB has coordinated with the FASB and understands that the FASB intends to coincide the effective date of its GAAP hierarchy standard with that of the PCAOB.

The amendments will become effective 60 days after SEC approval.

http://pcaob.org/News_and_Events/News/2008/01-29.aspx

January 15, 2008

The FASB has released FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which organizes thousands of pronouncements comprising U.S. GAAP into a combined single source.  This includes pronouncements of the FASB, the AICPA’s Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC) and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF). The FASB is exposing this codification for a verification phase of one year.  During this time, users may register to use the online system free of charge.

Press Release
http://www.fasb.org/news/nr011508.shtml

Codification
http://asc.fasb.org


January 10, 2008

The FASB issued Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. E23, effective January 1, 2008, which provides guidance that allows the "shortcut" method of accounting for derivative and hedging instruments to be applied in two cases: (i) swaps that have a non-zero fair value at inception and (ii) hedge items that have a settlement date subsequent to the swap trade date.


December 21, 2007

The SEC issued SAB No. 110, which amends SAB 107 to allow the "simplified" method in developing an estimate of the expected term of so-called "plain vanilla" stock options accounted for under FAS 123R, Share-Based Payment under certain circumstances,.

Press Release

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-267.htm

SAB 109

http://www.sec.gov/interps/account/sab110.htm

December 4, 2007

The FASB issued Statement of FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (FAS 141R) and FAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160). Both statements are effective for public and private companies for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Thus they will be effective January 1, 2009 for calendar year end companies. FAS 141R will be applied prospectively. FAS 160 requires retroactive adoption for exiting minority interests and is otherwise prospective. Early adoption is not permitted.

FAS 141R

Summary http://www.fasb.org/st/summary/stsum141r.shtml

Text http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fas141r.pdf

FAS 160

Summary http://www.fasb.org/st/summary/stsum160.shtml

Text http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fas160.pdf

November 5, 2007

The SEC issued SAB No. 109, "Written Loan Commmitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings," which revises and rescinds portions of SAB 105

Press Release

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-225.htm

SAB 109

http://www.sec.gov/interps/account/sab109.htm

July 25, 2007

The SEC approved the PCAOB's Auditing Standard No. 5: An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements ("AS No. 5"), which replaces Auditing Standard No. 2: An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction With an Audit of Financial Statements.

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-144.htm

May 24, 2007

The PCAOB adopted Auditing Standard No. 5: An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements ("AS No. 5"), which replaces Auditing Standard No. 2: An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction With an Audit of Financial Statements.

http://www.pcaobus.org/Rules/Docket_021/2007-05-24_Release_No_2007-005.pdf

May 23, 2007

The SEC adopted interpretive guidance for managers of public companies on how to conduct annual evaluations of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-104.htm

May 4, 2007

The FASB released Staff Position No. FIN 48-1, which provides final guidance on the definition of “settlement” in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fin48-1.pdf

The FASB issued Staff Position No. FIN 39-1, which amends FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.

http://pcps.aicpa.org/Resources/Keeping+Up+With+Standards/Risk+Assessment+Standards+Implementation+Guidance.htm

April 27, 2007

The Private Companies Practice Section (PCPS) of the AICPA has posted an online toolkit relating to Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 112 “Communication of Internal Control Related Matters Identified in an Audit.”  SAS No. 112 is effective for audits performed on or after December 15, 2006. 

http://pcps.aicpa.org/Resources/Keeping+Up+With+Standards/SAS+No+112+Toolkit.htm

The PCPS has also posted reference materials relating to new risk assessment standards issued by the Auditing Standards Board (ASB) effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2006.

http://pcps.aicpa.org/Resources/Keeping+Up+With+Standards/Risk+Assessment+Standards+Implementation+Guidance.htm

February 23, 2007

The AICPA issued 10 TPAs relating to Statement of Position No. 05-1, Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts (SOP 05-1).

http://www.aicpa.org/download/acctstd/SOP_05-1_TPAs.pdf

The FASB issued FSP FAS 158-1 providing guidance on accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits under, and amending, FAS Nos. 87, 88, and 106 considering FAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.

http://fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fas158-1.pdf

February 15, 2007

The FASB issued FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.   This standard permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis.  FAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, or January 1, 2008 for calendar year end companies.

News Release

http://www.fasb.org/news/nr021507.shtml

Summary

http://fasb.org/st/summary/stsum159.shtml

Statement

http://fasb.org/pdf/fas159.pdf


January 4, 2007

The FASB staff released FSP FAS ETIF 00-19-2 which provides guidance under FASB No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies in accounting for a contingent obligation to make future payments, or otherwise transfer consideration, under a registration rights arrangement. The FSP also explains how to account for a financial instrument under GAAP that includes a payment arrangement in connection with registration rights.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_eitf00-19-2.pdf

November 30, 2006

The Accounting Standards, Auditing and Attest Standards, and Tax Teams of the AICPA have issued non-authoritative Practice Guide on Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions Under FIN 48.  

http://tax.aicpa.org/Resources/Professional+Standards+and+Ethics/Practice+Guide+on+Accounting+for+Uncertain+Tax+Positions+Under+FIN+48.htm

October 10, 2006

The FASB staff released FSP FAS 123(R)-5, addressing whether modifying an instrument in connection with an equity restructuring should be considered a modification when applying an FSP FAS 123(R)-1, which relates to modifications to financial instruments issued to employees as compensation when the employee no longer works for the company.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fas123r-5.pdf

Below is a link to FSP FAS 123(R)-1:

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fas123r-1.pdf

The following is a link to the discussion of this amendment:

http://www.fasb.org/project/amend_fspfas123r-1.shtml

September 29, 2006

The FASB issued FAS 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).  Under the new standard, calender year companies with publicly traded equity securities must recognize a net liability or asset to report the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on their balance sheets effective as of December 31, 2006.

News Release

http://www.fasb.org/news/nr092906.shtml

Summary

http://www.fasb.org/st/summary/stsum158.shtml

FAS 158

http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fas158.pdf

September 18, 2006

The FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements.  This standard provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities.

Summary

http://www.fasb.org/st/summary/stsum157.shtml

FAS 157 (Excludes Appendix E – to be posted later)

http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fas156.pdf

September 14, 2006

The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulleting (SAB) No. 108 to provide advice on how companies should analyze mistatements in current and prior financial statements to determine whether the mistatements are material with respect to any of such financial statements.  Companies that have used the "rollover" and "iron curtain" methods will need to change to a "dual approach" under both the iron-curtain and the roll-over methods for fiscal year ending on or after November 15, 2006. 

http://www.sec.gov/interps/account/sab108.pdf

September 8, 2006

The FASB staff issued FSP AUG AIR-1, which prohibits the use of the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_augair-1.pdf

July 13, 2006

The FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.  FIN 48 requires recognition and measurement of uncertain income tax positions using a "more-likely-than-not" approach.  FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.

http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fin%2048.pdf

The FASB issued FSP No. FAS 13-2, which amends FASB Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases, with respect to the timing of cash flows related to income taxes that are generated by a leveraged-lease transaction.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fas13-2.pdf

July 11, 2006

COSO issued guidance on internal controls for small public companies.

http://www.coso.org/publications.htm

June 9, 2006

The PCAOB issued Q&A stating that either a successor auditor or a predecessor auditor can audit adjustments made to prior-period financial statements if that auditor is independent and registered with the PCAOB.  The Q&A also addresses responsibilities of auditors and the wording and dating of the audit report.

http://www.pcaobus.org/Standards/Staff_Questions_and_Answers/2006/QA_Adjustments.pdf

June 7, 2006

The AICPA issued a TPA stating that if consolidation is required under GAAP, parent company-only financial statements would not be in accordance with GAAP.

http://www.aicpa.org/download/acctstd/Parent_Only_TPA_Final.pdf

June 5, 2006

The AICPA released two TPAs to provide guidance on Statement of Position 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer." The TPAs provide examples of how to account for multiple loan pools accounted for as a single asset.

http://www.aicpa.org/download/acctstd/TPA_03-3.pdf

http://www.aicpa.org/download/acctstd/TPA_03-3A.pdf

May 17, 2006

The AICPA released two TPAs addressing questions with respect to Statement of Position (SOP) No. 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.
http://www.aicpa.org/download/acctstd/TPA_03-3A.pdf

April 26, 2006

The AICPA staff issued four new Technical Practice Aid (TPA) questions and answers concerning accounting and auditing issues related to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.

http://www.aicpa.org/download/acctstd/FIN_46_R_TPAs.pdf

April 21, 2006

The SEC issued an order approving the PCAOB auditor ethics and independence rules concerning independence, tax services, and contingent fees.

The PCAOB's press release is available on the PCAOB's website.

http://www.pcaobus.org/News_and_Events/News/2006/04-21.aspx

The SEC's approval order is posted on the SEC’s website.

http://www.sec.gov/rules/pcaob/2006/34-53677.pdf

April 13, 2006

The FASB issued FSP FIN 46(R)-6, which provides rules to be used to determine the variability to be considered when applying FIN 46(R) on consolidation of variable interest entities.   The FSP is required to be applied prospectively to all entities with which an enterprise first becomes involved and to all entities previously required to be analyzed under FIN 46(R) when a reconsideration event has occurred pursuant to paragraph 7 of FIN 46(r) beginning the first day of the first reporting period beginning after June 15, 2006.  Retrospective application is not required but, if elected, must be completed no later than the end of the first annual reporting period ending after July 15, 2006.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fin46r-6.pdf

March 22, 2006

The FASB issued Statement No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets”  This is an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.  The new standar clarifies when to separately account for servicing rights, requires servicing rights to be separately recognized initially at fair value, and provides the option of subsequently accounting for servicing rights at either fair value or under the amortization method.  The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006 but can be adopted early as long as financial statements for the fiscal year in which early adoption is elected, including interim statements, have not yet been issued.

http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fas156.pdf

February 16, 2006

The FASB issued "Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments."   This is an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.  The new standard allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis.  The standard also provides makes certain other specific changes.  This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.

http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fas155.pdf

February 9, 2006

The PCAOB accounced that, on February 6, 2006, the SEC approved PCAOB Standard No. 4, “Reporting on Whether a Previously Reported Material Weakness Continues to Exis” which provides what an auditor must do when reporting on the remediation of a pre-existing material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of a date other than at year end.

http://www.pcaobus.org/News_and_Events/News/2006/02-09.aspx

February 3, 2006

The FASB issued FSP No. FAS 123(R)-4, “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event.”  The FSP amends FAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payments” to provide that a contingency will not require liability method accounting if the contingent event is not probable and not in the control of the employee. If the contingent event becomes probable, the stock option must only then be accounted for under the liability method as a modification that changes an equity award to a liability award. 

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fas123r-4.pdf

December 29, 2005

FSP #SOP 94-4-1

The FASB issued FSP #SOP 94-4-1 which provides guidance if an investment company desires to to value an investment contract at “contract value”, representing the principal balance plus accrued interest, instead of fair value.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_aag_inv-1&sop_94-4-1.pdf

December 19, 2005

TPA #21.03.09

The AICPA issued a non-authoritative technical practice aid (“TPA”) on how to apply the requirements of its position on accounting for debts and other securities acquired in a transfer to clarify SOP No. 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.

TPA #21.03.09 addresses issues relating to instruments that are measured like debt securities, assessing delays and shortfalls, evidence of credit quality and probable deficiency, non-accrual loans, loans held for sale, treatment of commercial revolving loans and other questions.

http://www.aicpa.org/download/acctstd/TPA_03-3.pdf

FSP #SOP 94-6-1

The FASB issued FSP #SOP 94-6-1, Terms of Loan Products That May Give Rise to a Concentration of Credit Risk.   The FSP is effective immediately.  The FSP addresses loan products that may result in a concentration of credit risk, as defined in FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_sop94-6-1.pdf

November 23, 2005

The AICPA staff has issued Q&A (that are non-authoritative) related to accounting for operating leases. The Q&A are applicable to public companies, private companies, and not-for-profit organizations and focus on issues that resulted in restatements earlier in 2005.  The Q&A provide guidance on (i) the term of a lease for accounting purposes, (ii) the period which a lessee should amortize or depreciate leasehold improvements, (iii) the periods that rent expense and rent revenue are to be recognized, such as during rent holidays and scheduled rent and space increases, and (iv) accounting for landlord incentive allowances in an operating lease, including classification on the statement of cash flows.

http://www.aicpa.org/download/acctstd/LEASE_TPAs_5600.07.pdf

November 10, 2005

FSP No. FIN 45-3

The FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FIN 45-3, “Application of FASB Interpretation [FIN] No. 45 to Minimum Revenue Guarantees Granted to a Business or Its Owners.” This FSP provides that a guarantor that provides a minimum revenue guarantee (such as in an earn-out provision) must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation under FIN No. 45, “Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements of Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” The FSP is effective at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter following November, 10, 2005.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fin45-3.pdf.

See also FIN 45  http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fin%2045.pdf.

FSP No. FAS 123(R)-3

Also, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.”  The FSP authorizes a short-cut for for companies that do not have the records and/or resources to calculate the pool of windfall tax benefits required by FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. The short-cut method provides relief FAS 123(R).

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fas123r-3.pdf.

See also FAS 123(R) http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fas123r.pdf

See also SAB 107 http://www.sec.gov/interps/account/sab107.pdf

November 3, 2005

On November 3, 2005, the FASB staff issued FSP No. FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1 which withdraws guidance on determining whether an impairment is other-than-temporary in EITF 03-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments," that was issued in 2004. However, the FSP continues the guidance in EITF 03-1 for determining (i) when an investment is impaired, (ii) how to measure the impairment loss, and (iii) what disclosures should be made regarding impaired securities.

http://www.fasb.org/fasb_staff_positions/fsp_fas115-1&fas124-1.pdf

November 1, 2005

The following outlines how to analyze loss contingencies and unasserted claims under FAS 5:
http://www.fasb.org/pdf/fas5.pdf

See also Topic Y of the SEC's Codification of Staff Accounting Bulletins:http://www.sec.gov/interps/account/sabcodet5.htm#5y

1.         If the matter is not an unasserted claim, go to step 2.  If the matter involves an unasserted claim, first determine whether it is probable or not that the party will make a claim. 

If it is not “probable” that a party will make a claim that is yet unasserted, the unasserted claim does not need to be disclosed or accrued.  Probable generally means that the likelihood is more than about 75-80%.

If it is “probable” that a party will make a claim that is yet unasserted, the unasserted claim must be evaluated as any other loss contingency under FAS 5.

2.         Loss contingencies are to be evaluated as follows:

Loss contingencies must be evaluated as to (i) the likelihood of outcome and (ii) whether the dollar amount can be reasonably estimated.

The likelihood of outcome can be either remote, reasonably possible, or probable.

If the likelihood of a loss is “remote”, there is no need for accrual or disclosure, regardless of materiality.  Remote generally means that the probability is less than 5-10%. 

If the likelihood is “reasonably possible” but not probable, there would be no accrual, but footnote disclosure would be required of the contingency if material, together with an estimate of the amount of the possible loss if it can be reasonably estimated, or a reasonable range of the loss, or a statement that no reasonable estimate is possible.  Reasonably possible generally means that the probability is more than remote (5-10%) and less than probable (75-80%).

If the likelihood is “probable” and an amount can be reasonably estimated (see next paragraph), the amount must be accrued and additional disclosure may be required if necessary to not be misleading.  If an amount or range cannot be reasonably estimated, disclosure is required of the contingency with a range of the possible loss or a statement that no reasonable range of loss can be estimated. 

For loss contingencies that will be accrued, but if only a range of loss can be reasonably estimated, the best estimate within that range is accrued.  If none of the estimates within the range is better than any other, the low end of the range is accrued, and disclosure should be made of the range.

A gain contingency is never accrued, but may need to be disclosed.  The disclosure note should not give misleading implications as to the likelihood of realization.  A gain is not recorded until realized.  See ARB 50.

Note that if the likelihood of an event is in the “reasonably possible” or higher range, it may also be necessary to disclose the matter if material in MD&A under Item 303 of Regulation S-K and SEC interpretations thereof.  These require the disclosure of any known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that are “reasonably likely” to have a material effect (negative or positive) on liquidity, financial condition or operating performance.  An SEC commissioner once suggested that “reasonably likely” means about 40% probability.  Note that this is within but is not the same as “reasonably possible” under FAS 5.